I agree the MUG is the correct place to discuss it, but I think that the
devlopment of the specification should take place within the MHEG (WG
12) working group. I would not like to see MUG competing with WG 12 but
co-operating, in the sense that the user group can do fast prototyping,
testing, verifaction, and implementation work, while the development of
the specification should be done within the scope of the WG.
>
> My current target is of course DAVIC, however, I'm also interested in
> some kind of international profiles approved by a certain body like
> MUG.
But shouldn't that body be an ISO one: SC 29/WG12?
Because of their interest in this work, I wonder if the japanese NB would
supply an editor or co-editor for WG 12 sponsored work developing some of
these profiles.
Sincerely
Tom
>
> Regards,
>
> ** Wataru KAMEYAMA, Graphics Communication Laboratories, JAPAN
> ** TEL: +81 3 5351 0181
> ** FAX: +81 3 5351 0185
> ** wak@gctech.co.jp ($B55;3!!>D!w#G#C#L(B in KANJI)
>
-- Thomas J Casey tel: +44 (0)171 837 8379 fax: +44 (0)171 837 6900 email: tcasey@tcasey.demon.co.uk