Regarding:
>> Section 29.4 Effect of MHEG-5 actions, TokenGroup
>>
>> The current use of index is wrong.
>>
>> - CallActionSlot: step 3 should read: <<Consider the ActionSlot that is at
>> position Index in the
>. ActionSlot sequence. If this ActionSlot is NULL, or if Index is greater
than
>> the number of
>> ActionSlots, then ignore the effect of the CallActionSlot action.
Otherwise,
>> execute that
>> ActionSlot.>>
>>
>>- Provision of use of CallActionSlot, second bullet should be removed.
Wataru wrote:
>I'm not against your proposal, but the "2nd Provision of use" is
>important I think. It gives the right range to the "index" and that
>is the purpose of "Provision of use", I believe. May I suggest to
>keep it?
OK, it's fine with me, let's keep the provision of use, but it is wrong as is
now, it should read:
<<Index shall be in the range [0, number of ActionSlots associated with the
Item that currently has the token.>>
...instead of [0, num of items] which does not make any sense here. Right?
>> Section 41.4 Effect of MHEG-5 actions, Interactible
>>
>> - Point 2. c. is redundant with the very last step of Interaction in
Internal
>> Behaviour of Slider (42.3),
>> EntryField (43.3) and Hypertext (44.3). It almost seems that the
>> InteractionCompleted event is
>> generated twice. I suggest to remove that last step in the Internal
Behaviour
>> of 42.3, 43.3, 44.3,
>> where it is sufficient to say: "set the InteractionStatus to False".
Wataru wrote:
>As far as I looked through the doc, I don't see any problem to remove
>the last step from 42.3, 43.3 and 44.3 (i.e. even if we take out them,
>the InteractionCompleted events are generated appropriately in any
>cases). But can someone confirm this point, too?
Yes, please more confirmations are good!
Tom