On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Yoshiharu DEWA wrote:
> > Agreed, but this means that someone has to apply an SetInteractionStatus(false)
> > if an interacting interactible is stopped. I think there is something missing
> > because anywhere else in the IS similar behaviours are automatically stopped
> > if an object becomes inactive.
> > Is this an action point? I think fixing this during the revisal of the
> > interactible classes would be a good idea.
>
> Yes, I fully agree with you. We should be proceed the discussion about
> this that already took up in Stockholm. (MHEG 97/1050 2.13)
Do you come to the Sydney meeting? I think it is a good idea to discuss this
face to face there. Maybe we come up with a proposal for the MTF.
Best regards,
Andreas
-- o _ Andreas Kraft (\_|_) GMD FOKUS, kraft@fokus.gmd.de, +49 30 3463-7232 T> ] [ The sky is the limit